• Resources
  • NPPC
  • Member Login
  • Contact
Minnesota Pork Producers Association
  • About MPPA
    • Checkoff vs. Association
    • MPPA Executive Board
    • MPPA Staff
  • MN Pork Production
  • Legislation
    • Get Involved
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Events Calendar
    • Press Releases
  • Join MPPA
    • Membership Benefits
    • Join MPPA Today
  • Pork Congress
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Sow Housing

May 1, 2012/in Latest News/by Minnesota Pork Producers Association
FacebookTweetLinkedInPinPrint

There are many different types of acceptable housing types in use by U.S. hog farmers for housing gestating sows. These housing types usually fit in one of two categories:

  • Individual housing
  • Group housing

The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) have reviewed existing scientific literature on sow housing and have published position statements that concluded that both types of housing types have advantages and disadvantages.

There are many factors that contribute to the success of a particular type of housing system. Studies have concluded the success of housing systems may be dependent in great measure to the caretaker’s husbandry skills.

The individual housing category includes the individual stall system. In this system, sows are housed in a structure large enough for one sow. There are variations in stall designs.

Some of the advantages of individual housing include:

  • minimize aggression and injury among sows
  • reduce competition for resources
  • allow individual feeding
  • assist in the control of body condition sow sows to not become too thin or too fat
  • provide for the safety of the worker

Some of the disadvantages of individual housing include:

  • restriction of movement and exercise
  • restricts ability to perform foraging behaviors
  • sows have limited social interaction

In the other housing category, sows are housed in groups. Group sizes may range from five sows per pen up to more than 100 sows per pen. Free access stalls, trickle feeding, electronic sow feeding stations and deep bedded systems are just a few of the many different variations in group housing systems in use.

Some of the advantages of group housing include:

  • freedom of movement and exercise
  • social interaction

Some of the potential disadvantages of group housing include:

  • aggression and injury
  • uneven body conditions
  • inability to forage if no manipulate materials are present

The AVMA and AASV have concluded that regardless of the type of housing system in use, the system should:

  • minimize aggression and competition among sows;
  • protect sows from detrimental effects associated with environmental extremes, particularly temperature extremes;
  • reduce exposure to hazards that result in injuries, pain, or disease;
  • provide every animal with daily access to appropriate food and water;
  • facilitate observation of individual sow appetite, respiratory rate, urination and defecation, and reproductive status by caregivers
https://www.mppainsider.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MNPork_White-07-1.png 0 0 Minnesota Pork Producers Association https://www.mppainsider.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/MNPork_White-07-1.png Minnesota Pork Producers Association2012-05-01 15:31:262019-12-18 10:17:35Sow Housing

Categories

  • Commentary
  • Latest News
  • Legislation
  • Press Releases
  • Reports

Recent News

  • MPPA Supports Farm Bill 2.0 in addressing critical industry challenge
  • Minnesota Pork Producers Association Recognizes 2026 Legislator of Distinction
  • Nine Minnesota farmer organizations file to intervene in activist litigation against two state agencies
  • Minnesota Pork Producers Association Executive Board Elects Two New Members
  • Minnesota Pork Names Sustainability Outreach Coordinator, Director of Producer Services
For more information on Minnesota Pig Farmers, find us on: facebook twitter pinterest
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
© Minnesota Pork Producers Association
Link to: NPPC Praises Domino’s For Rejecting HSUS Proposal Link to: NPPC Praises Domino’s For Rejecting HSUS Proposal NPPC Praises Domino’s For Rejecting HSUS Proposal Link to: Statement Of NPPC President R.C. Hunt On Safeway’s Decision On Sow Housing Link to: Statement Of NPPC President R.C. Hunt On Safeway’s Decision On Sow Housing Statement Of NPPC President R.C. Hunt On Safeway’s Decision On Sow Housin...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top